By Oliver Griffin, Luis Jaime Acosta and Nandita Bose
BOGOTA/WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro averted an economic disaster at the 11th hour after diplomats from his government and the U.S. reached a deal on deportation flights, but the Colombian business community on Monday called for cooler heads to prevail as Colombians bemoaned canceled U.S. visa appointments.
U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened tariffs and sanctions to punish Colombia for refusing to accept military flights carrying deportees, part of his sweeping immigration crackdown.
But in a statement late on Sunday, the White House said Colombia had agreed to accept the migrants after all and Washington would not impose the penalties. Colombia’s Foreign Minister Luis Gilberto Murillo said separately the country’s presidential plane was ready to carry deportees.
Colombia’s ambassador to the U.S., Daniel Garcia-Pena, a long-time diplomat and former peace commissioner, was key to the late-night resolution of the dispute, a Colombia foreign office source said, after “very tense” discussions.
Asked if Trump had used Petro as an example to other countries, a White House source with knowledge of the matter said “absolutely. Yes. Countries have an obligation to accept repatriation flights.”
“The United States is simply sending back the criminals that Colombia sent to the United States,” the source added.
Petro’s condemnation of the use of military planes, saying deportees were being treated like criminals and that his administration is “the opposite of the Nazis”, seemed to rile Trump more than similar spats with Mexico and Brazil.
The showdown between Petro and Trump, who has been in office a week, played out through verbose posts on social media, with Petro on X and Trump on Truth Social.
The measures announced by Trump, including a 25% tariff on all Colombian goods that was set to rise to 50% in a week and emergency treasury, banking and financial sanctions, would have had an “immense impact” on the Colombia economy, said Bruce Mac Master, president of business association ANDI.
“It was very worrying how the president approached the problem because he was not conscious about all the consequences that it would have for the country,” Mac Master told Reuters.
“It’s as if Colombia had raised its hand and said ‘I want to be part of the fight, please include me’. Well, they included us and we learned how we could potentially lose a lot,” Mac Master said, adding leaders in Brazil and Mexico had handled the issue better.
The U.S. is Colombia’s largest trading partner, largely due to a 2006 free trade agreement, with $33.8 billion worth of two-way trade in 2023 and a $1.6 billion U.S. trade surplus, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
The U.S. accounted for a little over 29% of Colombia’s exports in the first 11 months of 2024, according to Colombia’s statistics agency.
Billions of dollars of exports of Colombian oil, coal and coffee all make their way north, as do around $1 billion in flowers, especially before upcoming Valentine’s Day.
Colombia’s already weak currency was down in early trading on Monday. Economic growth was a tepid 2% in the third quarter.
The cancellation of visa appointments at the U.S. embassy in Bogota frustrated many people, who told Reuters they had received emails saying appointments would be rescheduled.
The rigorous visa process for Colombians to go to the U.S., including as tourists, can take years and come at great expense for those who must travel to Bogota for several embassy appointments.
“We hope the president will fix this,” said Diosa Camacho, who traveled from the eastern city of Bucaramanga. Camacho said she had been in the visa process for more than a year.
Valentina Forero said her family has been in the process for two years and though she wants deportees to be treated with respect, she wished the spat had been handled differently.
“They should have discussed it between the two governments and not included the people,” she said. “It wasn’t diplomatic.”
The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did Petro’s office or the Colombian foreign ministry.
(Reporting by Oliver Griffin, Luis Jaime Acosta, Camilo Cohecha and Javier Andres Rojas in Bogota and Nandita Bose in Washington; Writing by Julia Symmes Cobb)
Comments