By David Lawder and Andrea Shalal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Hundreds of global finance leaders will descend on Washington this week, each with a singular mission: Who can I talk with to cut a trade deal?
The semi-annual gatherings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank Group are bustling affairs with high-level multilateral policy talks, but also one-on-one meetings between finance ministers eager to broker deals on things like project financing, foreign investment back home and, for poorer economies, debt relief.
This year, rather than policy coordination on climate change, inflation and financial support for Ukraine’s struggle against Russia’s invasion, one issue will dominate: tariffs.
More specifically, how to get out from under – or at least minimize – the pain from U.S. President Donald Trump’s unprecedented barrage of steep import taxes since his return to the White House in January.
And the focus may be largely on one man, new U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is Trump’s lead negotiator for tariff deals and whose support for the IMF and World Bank remains a question mark.
“Trade wars will dominate the week, as will the bilateral negotiations that nearly every country is trying to pursue in some way, shape or form,” said Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center. “So this becomes a Spring Meetings unlike any others, dominated by one single issue.”
‘NOTABLE MARKDOWNS’
Trump’s tariffs are already darkening the IMF’s economic forecasts, due to be released on Tuesday, which will put more pressure on developing country debt burdens.
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said last week that the World Economic Outlook’s growth projections will include “notable markdowns but not recession,” largely due to “off the charts” uncertainty and market volatility caused by the tariff turmoil.
Although Georgieva said the world’s real economy continues to function well, she warned that increasingly negative perceptions about the trade turmoil and concerns about recession could slow economic activity.
Lipsky said a potential new challenge for policymakers is whether the dollar will still be a safe haven asset, after Trump’s tariffs sparked a sell-off in U.S. Treasury debt.
The IMF and World Bank meetings, along with a sideline gathering of Group of 20 finance leaders have proved crucial forums for coordinating forceful policy actions in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008-2009 global financial crisis.
This time, with trade ministers in tow, delegations will be aiming to shore up their own economies first, policy experts say.
“The focus of these meetings in the past couple of years, which has been heavily on multilateral development bank reform and to some extent on strengthening the sovereign debt architecture, will fall by the wayside,” said Nancy Lee, a former U.S. Treasury official who is a senior policy fellow at the Center for Global Development in Washington.
BESSENT TARIFF TALKS
Japan, pressured by Trump’s 25% tariffs on autos and steel and reciprocal tariffs on everything else that could hit 24%, is particularly keen to sew up a U.S. tariff deal quickly.
With talks more advanced than those of other countries and participation by Trump, Japanese Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato is expected to meet with Bessent to resume the negotiations on the sidelines of the IMF and World Bank gathering.
South Korean Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok also accepted an invitation from Bessent to meet this week to discuss trade, Seoul’s finance ministry said as the export-dependent U.S. ally seeks to delay implementation of 25% tariffs and cooperate with the U.S. on areas of mutual interest such as energy and shipbuilding.
But many participants in the meetings have questions over the Trump administration’s support for the IMF and the World Bank. Project 2025, the hard-right Republican policy manifesto that has influenced many of Trump’s decisions to reshape government, has called for the U.S. to withdraw from the institutions.
“I really see a key role for Secretary Bessent in these meetings to answer some very basic questions,” Lee said. “First and foremost, does the U.S. view support for MDBs (multilateral development banks) as in its interest?” Lee said.
U.S. FINANCIAL SUPPORT
World Bank President Ajay Banga said last week that he has had constructive discussions with the Trump administration, but he did not know whether it would fund the $4 billion U.S. contribution to the bank’s fund for the world’s poorest countries pledged last year by former president Joe Biden’s administration.
Banga also is expected to expand this week on the bank’s energy financing pivot from primarily renewables to include nuclear and more gas projects and a shift towards more climate adaptation projects — a mix more in line with Trump’s priorities.
Bessent did back the IMF’s new, $20 billion loan program for Argentina, traveling to Buenos Aires last week in a show of support for the country’s economic reforms and saying the U.S. wanted more such alternatives to “rapacious” bilateral loan deals with China.
Three former career Treasury officials who later represented the U.S. on the IMF executive board called the Fund “a great financial deal for America.”
Meg Lundsager, Elizabeth Shortino and Mark Sobel said in an opinion piece published in The Hill newspaper that the IMF offers the U.S., the dominant shareholder, substantial economic influence at virtually zero cost.
“If the U.S. steps back from the IMF, China wins,” they wrote. “Our influence allows us to shape the IMF to achieve American priorities.”
(Reporting by David Lawder and Andrea Shalal; Additional reporting by Daniel Burns; Editing by Daniel Wallis)
Comments